How I Structure 5 Years of Retirement Income Before Touching Equities

Most retirees assume retirement income comes from “the portfolio.”

That’s incomplete.

In higher net worth households, I separate the portfolio into two distinct functions:

  1. Income security

  2. Long-term growth

Before we allow equities to fund lifestyle, we build an income structure first.

Here is how I do it.

Step 1: Define the Real Annual Income Requirement

We do not start with portfolio size.

We start with lifestyle.

For affluent households in this area, that often includes:

  • Primary residence expenses

  • Northern Michigan property

  • Possibly a Florida home

  • Travel

  • Healthcare

  • Ongoing gifting to children

We calculate:

  • Baseline required spending

  • Discretionary spending

  • Irregular large expenses

Then we subtract:

  • Social Security

  • Pension income

  • Rental income

  • Any guaranteed streams

What remains is the annual portfolio withdrawal requirement.

This number must be precise.

Step 2: Multiply by Five

If a household needs $250,000 per year from the portfolio after guaranteed income, we reserve approximately $1.25 million in stable assets.

Not in theory.

In structure.

That capital is not designed to grow aggressively.

It is designed to fund life.

The purpose is psychological and mathematical:

  • If markets decline in year one or two, we are not forced to sell equities at depressed prices.

  • The household sleeps well knowing income is already staged.

This is sequence risk mitigation.

Not market timing.

Step 3: Allocate the Income Sleeve Intentionally

The five-year income reserve is not placed entirely in cash.

It is typically structured across:

  • High-quality short-term bonds

  • Treasury ladders

  • Money market funds

  • Possibly conservative fixed income vehicles

The goal is:

Stability
Liquidity
Minimal duration risk

This sleeve exists to absorb volatility elsewhere.

It is not there to outperform.

Step 4: Leave the Remainder Invested for Long-Term Growth

If a client has $6M invested and we reserve $1.25M for five years of income, the remaining $4.75M remains growth-oriented.

This portion is allowed to:

  • Capture equity market returns

  • Compound

  • Outpace inflation

Because near-term income is protected, we do not need to react emotionally to market swings.

Equities are touched only when markets are cooperative or when the income sleeve needs replenishing after recovery.

Step 5: Refill Strategically

As years pass, we monitor:

  • Market performance

  • Withdrawal rates

  • Interest rate environment

When equities perform well, we harvest gains to refill the income sleeve.

When markets are down, we draw from the pre-funded income structure instead.

This is disciplined rebalancing with purpose.

Why I Prefer Five Years

Why not three?

Why not two?

In affluent retirements, lifestyle overhead is often higher.

Multi-property maintenance, travel, and healthcare are not optional.

Five years provides a cushion that allows:

  • Multiple market cycles

  • Time for recovery

  • Reduced emotional decision-making

For many households, the greatest risk is not running out of money.

It is reacting poorly during volatility.

Five years removes urgency.

Urgency creates mistakes.

What This Is Not

This is not a prediction strategy.

It does not assume markets will fall.

It does not assume markets will rise.

It assumes volatility exists and structures around it.

In Grosse Pointe, many retirees have substantial accumulated wealth.

The question is rarely whether the portfolio can theoretically support retirement.

The question is whether the structure prevents unnecessary stress during inevitable downturns.

The Result

Clients often tell me the biggest benefit of this approach is not mathematical.

It is emotional.

When five years of income is already staged:

  • Market headlines matter less

  • Temporary declines feel manageable

  • Decisions are deliberate

Retirement becomes less about reacting and more about living.


Previous
Previous

What an $8M Portfolio Looks Like When It’s Built for Income, Not Growth

Next
Next

What I Actually Look At Before Recommending a Roth Conversion